Poetry and Scientific Exposition: An Analysis
of Two Forms of Symbolic Representation
by Monica Wengrowicz
Cooper
Introduction
Art and science are generally thought to be two different forms of human
activity. When speaking of "arts," we normally use the term to encompass
diverse types of art such as painting, poetry, and music, even though
the modes of symbolization in the different arts are based on different
characters such as notes, lines, and words. Science (and I refer here
to natural science), however, communicates its findings using the same
symbolization scheme as the literary arts, namely, the English language.
The book Languages of Art by Nelson Goodman provides a set of
categories that purportedly serve to analyze a symbolic representation
in its form as well as in its referent. The exercise of examining the
way in which a scientific paper is written and its comparison to a literary
piece might allow us to understand where the work of art and the work
of science are each located, as well as their means of symbolic representation.
The questions one might ask are: how is the symbolization scheme used
differently in the two activities? How different are the written symbols
of the literary arts from those of science and in what way? How are the
different meanings conveyed and what is the realm of those meanings? Is
a scientific paper a literary art, and if not, why not? Is a literary
piece fulfilling a scientific function? If the two forms are different,
how do words "stretch" to do both tasks? Where does the work of art reside?
Where does the work of science reside? The exercise of comparison for
the purpose of analysis and understanding can be a very powerful means
of illuminating features hitherto unseen. And Goodman's work can be very
useful in guiding an exploration into a symbolic work. Goodman's analytical
categories are used here in a novel way, namely directly applied to particular
instances of symbolic representations. This approach is shown to yield
an understanding of the way in which poetry and scientific writings have
to be read.
|
|